Allegations against a minor can either be true or what?

The correct answer is that allegations against a minor can either be true or unproven. In the context of legal matters involving minors, the idea of "unproven" stands out because it recognizes that allegations may be made without sufficient evidence to substantiate them. This highlights the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, particularly in cases involving minors, where the legal system often places additional emphasis on protecting the rights of vulnerable individuals.

While the term "not true" may seem similar, it lacks the legal nuance that "unproven" provides. Allegations may be made based on various circumstances, and until an investigation takes place or evidence is presented, the truth of those allegations remains indeterminate. The distinction is important; accusations may not necessarily be false outright, but without evidence, they are simply unverified.

Disputing the claim, while a valid situation, does not cover the full range of possibilities since disputes may arise post-accusation, affecting how the case is perceived but not addressing the initial state of verification. Thus, “unproven” reflects the legal status of allegations more accurately, encapsulating the idea that an allegation exists without confirmed validation.