Which courts may the Supreme Court review cases from?

The Supreme Court has the jurisdiction to review cases from various courts, specifically including Courts of Appeal, death penalty cases, and disciplinary cases. This breadth of review is essential in maintaining uniformity and consistency in the interpretation of law across different levels of the judiciary.

Cases arising from the Courts of Appeal are typically geared towards significant legal principles or conflicts in law that require resolution at the highest judicial level. Death penalty cases are given special status due to their severe consequences and the importance of ensuring that all judicial processes leading to a death sentence adhere to constitutional protections. Additionally, the Supreme Court can review disciplinary cases to ensure that the actions taken by lower courts or professional regulatory bodies comply with legal standards and due process.

The other options are narrower in scope. Limiting the Supreme Court’s review to only Superior Courts, for instance, would disregard cases from other vital judicial levels. Similarly, focusing solely on death penalty cases or all criminal cases ignores the broader range of legal issues the Supreme Court addresses. Thus, the comprehensive nature of option C accurately reflects the Supreme Court's role in overseeing the legal landscape.