Which type of jurisdiction refers to cases involving both civil rights and damages?

The term "civil jurisdiction - unlimited" refers to the authority of a court to hear almost any type of civil case, including those that involve civil rights issues and claims for damages. This type of jurisdiction allows a court to issue decisions on a broad range of civil matters without predefined limitations on the amount of damages sought or the nature of the civil rights at issue.

Cases involving civil rights typically address violations related to individual freedoms and protections afforded by law, while claims for damages involve seeking monetary compensation for harm or injury suffered. Since unlimited civil jurisdiction encompasses both these elements, it is appropriate for cases where civil rights might be asserted alongside requests for damages.

In contrast, the other types of jurisdictions mentioned either restrict the scope or type of cases that can be heard or focus on specific legal fields. For example, limited civil jurisdiction typically involves cases with lower monetary thresholds or specific types of disputes. Tort jurisdiction often refers specifically to civil wrongs leading to personal injury or damages, without the broader application to civil rights that unlimited jurisdiction encompasses. Family jurisdiction focuses on legal matters pertaining specifically to familial relationships, such as divorce or child custody, and does not encompass broader civil rights or damages claims.